The new glue Saramago maintains frescoes of Michelangelo, lying close to the slippery fingers Sistine. The Nobel experiment has too many sad evidence that is neither more nor less than a prize to an author's contribution to promote world peace (the speech of Miss Universe) through his writings, the correction of the current policy, in short. Examples
dismal and disappointing revelations, that Jorge Luis Borges took prominent describing reactions of the winners under the common denominator of apathy, except Ernest Hemingway, who celebrated a toast pure, naturally. Jean-Paul Sartre once nearly came to complain about the Nobel announcement, claiming that the Swedish Academy was not one to judge his work, and after rejecting arguing for ideological reasons, telephoned the academy members asking if there was any way of bagging the palo verde discretion. And he hung up. The same should have done Victoria Ocampo, since both the patriarch paginitas free marriage (read a good cuckold married to a lesbian) deigned to write for the benefit of the poor in spirit of a country that in literature no had only to learn, left the magazine Sur, in the words of the same Ocampo, "without a penny in the middle game."
Every so good award to palm off some leftist, with or without merit, I'm not going to be so unfair defenestrated Saramago only because I could not move from the four pages of his Blindness. In José Saramago lately are giving from all four sides, winds and cardinal points, a synergy of conservatism (left handed and right-handed) Catholic Church, Jewish community (with contempt), a Social Democrat MEP, Mario David, ashamed to be a compatriot of Saramago, the Portuguese society has said against him in Penafiel (where he presented his latest book), his colleague Miguel Sousa Tavares and follows the list of angry, perhaps we should expect the appearance of Robin Hood with the name of an arrow Saramago.
Again, rigor of justice that is necessary stick to each other and sometimes save breath, I give credit, though modest, a matacuras catófobo comunoide for misconduct as large and equations that could make you give to Portuguese nationality and who knows, "confiscating the Nobel?
José Saramago has just published a book where the maximum undertaken against Judeo-Christian deity (we have to keep waiting for the great novel great against Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu) entitled Cain, yes, lower case (so that it is not saved nor monte Ararat "), citing well all the names of biblical characters and locations involved in a novelette of $ 55 and extrapolating and revised at will and whim passages the Old Testament, ancient game designed to never tire. Then
theologian José Tolentino Mendonça I went to visit his home to explain the basics Franciscan, the Genesis is a reflection on the human condition, reflections on life, things that we understood and pagans and deadly in the catechism of our childhoods, well, not all, in Saramago's not.
do not see why take that trouble. Of course, no lit Saramago pointed out to him that his Cain offers nothing new to an exhausted argument that the claim of the whole as opposed to pimp Cain and Abel have dealt with better art Hermann Hesse Demian and Charles Baudelaire's poem Abel and Cain, not to mention neighboring Spain Miguel de Unamuno in Abel Sanchez, the other Nobel John Steinbeck East of Eden and Ernesto Sabato in the blind Report , they in turn took it from the sect of Gnostic treatise cainistas and two millennia old. Nobody has recalled the poetry of Rimbaud and blasphemies Nietzsche and fifty authors? And the ethereal Diary of Adam and Eve by Mark Twain , another Nobel Prize in Literature? Not tested
accused him of plagiarism, too?
The Bible, as he is a "manual of bad habits that should hide the children" is something that the Gospel is responsible for identifying from two thousand years this part, you should perhaps take a look, well, just for mischief or carelessness, that Jews are whiny, defeatist and talk too much is the material from which the late Norman Erlich and several Jewish comedians have fun and entertain us with admirable self-mockery, Mel Brooks has been parodied to Moses and the Fifteen Commandments five of which contained rules for the people Jewish and lost to fall out a table down the mountain, anyone who has attended (and who is not) a Catholic religion class is able to throw a couple of short paragraph about the frustrated killing of the son of Abraham, Isaac, and call it a fuck of bad taste about the Flood still wonder, five or six thousand years later, what expect cazzo above to send another style water to sweep so evil, and asks him to the last Bedouin pederast that Afghan opiates trafficked across the Sahara, about the fall of Sodom and Gomorrah and the children-always innocent by Saramago, who clearly were there and saw them succumb to a barrage of lightning, lava, fire, and diarrhea (and without an umbrella which is worse) - there is a very funny movie starring Anouk Aimée and Stewart Granger at all condescending to the Jewish people. Personally I would add that David was unfair to defeat Goliath because he did not fight unarmed and ballistics in a fight with bare hands is not peculiar to men.
In an interview with Clarin via email, Saramago is shipped with statements that do not threaten to shake the foundations of our beliefs or cast glare upon us most miserable that endlessly wander in the darkness of deception:
"My intention has been denouncing the absurdity of the "existence" of a god that men have invented and which were immediately enslaved. Being men what they are, the god that could only be what it is: cruel, vindictive, in short, bad .
" With Cain will not be another opportunity (the disappearance of humanity). If it is a Pyrrhic victory or not is not my thing. Actually, I think we do not deserve life .
" enough for me to introduce some uneasiness in the head of my readers .
Yes, exactly, you can not blame Saramago truthfully. should know that just because nobody in the world, illiterate or learned, never needed or needs to be introduced further uneasiness is that we deserve this life, which exempts Saramago the obligation to publish them.
without pedantry, I would point out that agnostic means, literally, unaware.
I were you I start to slip, Joseph, lest the Archangel Gabriel is taking aim and copper pass your wife partiédolos of lightning for your heinous sins.
dismal and disappointing revelations, that Jorge Luis Borges took prominent describing reactions of the winners under the common denominator of apathy, except Ernest Hemingway, who celebrated a toast pure, naturally. Jean-Paul Sartre once nearly came to complain about the Nobel announcement, claiming that the Swedish Academy was not one to judge his work, and after rejecting arguing for ideological reasons, telephoned the academy members asking if there was any way of bagging the palo verde discretion. And he hung up. The same should have done Victoria Ocampo, since both the patriarch paginitas free marriage (read a good cuckold married to a lesbian) deigned to write for the benefit of the poor in spirit of a country that in literature no had only to learn, left the magazine Sur, in the words of the same Ocampo, "without a penny in the middle game."
Every so good award to palm off some leftist, with or without merit, I'm not going to be so unfair defenestrated Saramago only because I could not move from the four pages of his Blindness. In José Saramago lately are giving from all four sides, winds and cardinal points, a synergy of conservatism (left handed and right-handed) Catholic Church, Jewish community (with contempt), a Social Democrat MEP, Mario David, ashamed to be a compatriot of Saramago, the Portuguese society has said against him in Penafiel (where he presented his latest book), his colleague Miguel Sousa Tavares and follows the list of angry, perhaps we should expect the appearance of Robin Hood with the name of an arrow Saramago.
Again, rigor of justice that is necessary stick to each other and sometimes save breath, I give credit, though modest, a matacuras catófobo comunoide for misconduct as large and equations that could make you give to Portuguese nationality and who knows, "confiscating the Nobel?
José Saramago has just published a book where the maximum undertaken against Judeo-Christian deity (we have to keep waiting for the great novel great against Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu) entitled Cain, yes, lower case (so that it is not saved nor monte Ararat "), citing well all the names of biblical characters and locations involved in a novelette of $ 55 and extrapolating and revised at will and whim passages the Old Testament, ancient game designed to never tire. Then
theologian José Tolentino Mendonça I went to visit his home to explain the basics Franciscan, the Genesis is a reflection on the human condition, reflections on life, things that we understood and pagans and deadly in the catechism of our childhoods, well, not all, in Saramago's not.
do not see why take that trouble. Of course, no lit Saramago pointed out to him that his Cain offers nothing new to an exhausted argument that the claim of the whole as opposed to pimp Cain and Abel have dealt with better art Hermann Hesse Demian and Charles Baudelaire's poem Abel and Cain, not to mention neighboring Spain Miguel de Unamuno in Abel Sanchez, the other Nobel John Steinbeck East of Eden and Ernesto Sabato in the blind Report , they in turn took it from the sect of Gnostic treatise cainistas and two millennia old. Nobody has recalled the poetry of Rimbaud and blasphemies Nietzsche and fifty authors? And the ethereal Diary of Adam and Eve by Mark Twain , another Nobel Prize in Literature? Not tested
accused him of plagiarism, too?
The Bible, as he is a "manual of bad habits that should hide the children" is something that the Gospel is responsible for identifying from two thousand years this part, you should perhaps take a look, well, just for mischief or carelessness, that Jews are whiny, defeatist and talk too much is the material from which the late Norman Erlich and several Jewish comedians have fun and entertain us with admirable self-mockery, Mel Brooks has been parodied to Moses and the Fifteen Commandments five of which contained rules for the people Jewish and lost to fall out a table down the mountain, anyone who has attended (and who is not) a Catholic religion class is able to throw a couple of short paragraph about the frustrated killing of the son of Abraham, Isaac, and call it a fuck of bad taste about the Flood still wonder, five or six thousand years later, what expect cazzo above to send another style water to sweep so evil, and asks him to the last Bedouin pederast that Afghan opiates trafficked across the Sahara, about the fall of Sodom and Gomorrah and the children-always innocent by Saramago, who clearly were there and saw them succumb to a barrage of lightning, lava, fire, and diarrhea (and without an umbrella which is worse) - there is a very funny movie starring Anouk Aimée and Stewart Granger at all condescending to the Jewish people. Personally I would add that David was unfair to defeat Goliath because he did not fight unarmed and ballistics in a fight with bare hands is not peculiar to men.
In an interview with Clarin via email, Saramago is shipped with statements that do not threaten to shake the foundations of our beliefs or cast glare upon us most miserable that endlessly wander in the darkness of deception:
"My intention has been denouncing the absurdity of the "existence" of a god that men have invented and which were immediately enslaved. Being men what they are, the god that could only be what it is: cruel, vindictive, in short, bad .
" With Cain will not be another opportunity (the disappearance of humanity). If it is a Pyrrhic victory or not is not my thing. Actually, I think we do not deserve life .
" enough for me to introduce some uneasiness in the head of my readers .
Yes, exactly, you can not blame Saramago truthfully. should know that just because nobody in the world, illiterate or learned, never needed or needs to be introduced further uneasiness is that we deserve this life, which exempts Saramago the obligation to publish them.
without pedantry, I would point out that agnostic means, literally, unaware.
I were you I start to slip, Joseph, lest the Archangel Gabriel is taking aim and copper pass your wife partiédolos of lightning for your heinous sins. 
